Sans-serif typeface

from Google Fonts, Lost Type CO-OP
designed by Joe Prince

Variable Font

1 axis: Weight

9 Styles

6 Weights: Regular to Black
3 Light Weights: on Lost Type (paid)

Best for

  • Headings (display text)
  • Long reading text (body text)
  • User Interfaces (functional text)

License

Free and Open Source

Specialty

A free sans-serif font with soft curves and bold shapes. Perfect for adding personality to your text without losing functionality!

My Maven Pro Font Review

This Google Font is neither brand new nor unknown, but I recently discovered it for my Quicksand alternatives article, and wanted to take a closer look. Maven Pro is a free sans-serif font family that strikes the balance between being interesting and functional. With its distinct curvature, it brings something friendly and unique to your text.

Unique Curvature Distinct type choice Maven Pro is a good choice for medium size text. Interesting enough to draw attention, but not too distracting. ¶ For text heavy use cases, better pick a little less striking font. Extra Light Weight
Maven Pro strikes a friendly and approachable balance with its unique curves and clean design

At first glance, it reminded me of FF Dax from the late ’90s. I’m sure Maven Pro drew inspiration from it, but it’s executed in a more contemporary way. FF Dax feels elegant because of its narrower proportions, slight contrast, and more dynamic letter shapes. Maven Pro is wider, more stable, and feels sturdier. See this by comparing the lower case “e”. These features let it perform well in small, functional text, too.

FF Dax is more dynamic, a little contrasting, and narrower. Maven Pro is more squarish, linear, and much wider.
FF Dax vs. Maven Pro. Notice how the “m” and “r” are similar in shape, but Maven Pro’s “p” and “a” feature softer, more modern curves.

When examining the typeface’s details, it shows that Maven Pro surprises with its soft curvatures, especially at letters like “a” and “d”. It gives some letters a simpler, more unique shape. Additionally, the gentle arches in the lower case “r”, “m” and “n” make it distinct.

Maven Pro has a squarish touch but leaves a soft impression

What I observed when I recommended it as an alternative for Quicksand, was that the Regular weight is quite light. Setting the font-weight to 450 helps when working with text sizes around 16 to 20 pixels. I did not do that it in the Quicksand article, but I’m making up for it here. See for yourself, which of these samples do you find more pleasant to read?

Maven Pro in Regular is just much too light for regular text. I suggest increasing the weight to 450. With the right contrast, the typeface is  very readable and flows nicely. For a whole article it still would be too attention grabbing.
😕 This is too light
😃 Much better for body text

On Google Fonts, Maven Pro covers the weights Regular to Black. If you want it light, you can buy a license on Lost Type for the three light weights. Unfortunately they are not included in a variable font then, also the character set it much more limited. But at least for the Google Font, give Maven Pro a try in your next design project, especially when looking for a balance between style and functionality.

Font Pairings with Maven Pro

Maven Pro is a dynamic, linear, sans-serif font. I recommend pairing it with one of these suggestions for long reading text or striking titles.

Maven Pro (free)
Maven Pro (free)
  • Headings
  • Copy
  • UI Text

Learn more about pairing typefaces using the Font Matrix.


Tell me, how did you like my deep dive into Maven Pro? Write it in the comments, also which font I should review next.

Typographic power to your inbox

  • Font Friday: I recommend one typeface per week, free fonts included.
  • Type Tuesdays: articles & videos that up your design game.
  • Join 2900+ typography enthusiasts, unsubscribe anytime.
Edition #176, published

4 Comments

  1. Hidden gems and Popular fonts, interchangeably, Oliver!

    Don’t like Maven, it’s like a bald guy in his 40s 😣Any font that doesn’t have serifs, or is sans with soft roundish “edges”, I see it as an absence of hair 🤷🏼‍♀️

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *