UI Fonts Checklist 🚀 Launch offer until May 30th Get 20% off
Font Friday

West

The sans-serif display typeface West shown on a mobile phone in a headline, and a pull quote, and the labels of a button and navigation.

Sans-serif Display typeface

by Daniel Perraudin, published by Fontwerk

18 styles (instances)

9 weights: Hairline to Black
all with matching italics

Variable Font

2 axes (weight and italic)

License for web/app usage

Single: from € 50 (web & app)
Family: from € 350 (web & app)

Best for

  • Headings (display text)
  • Long reading text (body text)
  • User Interfaces (functional text)

Specialty

Distinct, attention grabbing, and unusual, but still calm and stylish in its own way.

My thoughts on West

Categorizing typefaces is always hard, but with this one it’s a special challenge. I’d say West by Daniel Perraudin is a sans-serif display typeface. This means it works best in large, short text. But not only, which makes it so interesting with its unusual mix of styles. West has many visual idiosyncrasies. Some letters are pretty wide, like the g and the e, others are surprisingly narrow, like the lower case a, or just very unusual (f and w). This all makes it unsuited for reading text, the letter forms are just too striking.

West works best at larger sizes, and it comes with gorgeous numbers. For a tiny bit of body text it is still okay, but for longer reading text, some letters  are far too striking. Like the f, and the w. At smaller sizes, West still is surprisingly readable with its distinct letters, open shapes and sturdy stroke width. But it is also quite space consuming.
Look at that beautiful numbers! West’s striking letter shapes work great for display text, for body text they are too attention grabbing.

For functional text in a user interface, it still might work. The typeface is very even, and still readable at smaller sizes, even though it consumes a lot of space. I could imagine West as a typeface for an app design that does not need a lot of text, maybe mostly numbers? The numbers are just so beautiful, that it almost makes me weep for joy ! Look at that lively 2 and that strict 3. 😍 What a mix!

alternative Qs, and ampersands. Two styles of circled numbers and wayfinding icons showin bathroom symbols, a wheelchair symbol and a cloakroom symbol.
Alternative characters, circled numbers and icons make West a very versatile typeface for larger, short, display text.

There are plenty of alternative characters available, and the variable font gives you the possibilities to tweak the weight to your application’s exact needs. I also appreciate the wayfinding icons, crafted to fit the stroke width and style of the text, so useful when it comes to signage. And finally, West has one of the most badass promo videos for a typeface, I’ve seen. So check that out 😉.


What do you think? Is West something for an upcoming project, or have you used it in the past? Tell me in the comments below!

Typographic power to your inbox!

  • Font Friday: I personally recommend one typeface per week and for what use case it’s best. Every second week I recommend a free font.
  • Pimp my Type: Articles or videos from the YouTube channel that will help you to pimp up the type of your next design project.
  • No Comic Sans, Open Sans 😅 or any other BS, like annoying ads. Your email will only be used for the newsletters, unsubscribe anytime.

3 Comments

  1. Yeah, no.

    Display type is tough for me on the web since you really don’t have total control over the final rendered size. Agreed, West feels like it should always be BIG. It’s too blotchy in color at anything other than a headline for my eyes. I do like it at the larger sizes and yeah, those alts and icons *are* pretty interesting.

    Thanks for the post.

    1. Display really is challenging. In this case though, I think it would be still workings, because it’s not depending on the larger size to be well displayed. But yes, the more text set with it, the blotchier it gets (didn’t know that word, thanks for teaching me it).

      1. Return of the Blotch – I think I really wanted to use “splotchy” but the feeling is the same. Too much dark vs light in the “color” of the text.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *